Ansari, Yassamin

House of Representatives · Arizona · Rank #1 of 621

Score

Voting record

Budget votes.

At 929 dollars per patient, the military dollars this office backed could have funded pragmatic trials for about 0 patients.

Military $ Backed

Bills this office backed that expand military spending

Clinical Trials $

Bills this office backed that include clinical trial funding

Military : Medicine

1:1

Higher means more military than medicine

Score

Clinical-trial funding voted for, minus military spending voted for.

Military spending voted for

Clinical-trial funding voted for

Counted as 3.3% of NIH funding, the share NIH spends on clinical trials

Military-to-trials ratio

1:1

Federal budget as a whole: 1,112:1

Spending Scale (vs All Politicians)

Military spending$0

Clinical-trial funding$0

Both bars use the same scale. Clinical-trial funding is a fraction of the military spending

Share This Scorecard

Ansari, Yassamin voted for $0 in military spending and $0 in clinical-trial funding. https://optimitron.com/governments/US/politicians/A000381

X Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Email

Vote Record

Voted NAY

Full-Year CR FY2025 — Military ($892.5B)$893B

Full-Year CR FY2025 — NIH ($47.0B)$47B

NDAA FY2026 ($900.6B)$901B

MilCon FY2026 (H.R. 5371) — Military ($19.7B)$20B

Omnibus FY2026 — Military ($838.7B)$839B

Omnibus FY2026 — NIH ($47.5B)$48B

Not Voting / Absent

Reconciliation 2025 (H.R. 1) — Military ($156.2B)NO

How We Calculate

Military $

Military $ = Σ (bill amount for each YEA vote on NDAA, supplementals, or omnibus military portion)

NDAA and supplementals count at face value. Omnibus bills count only the military appropriation (~$858–886B/yr).

Clinical Trials $

Trials $ = NIH budget × 0.033

Only 3.3% of the NIH budget funds clinical trials ($1.56B of $47.3B). The other 96.7% is basic research, overhead, and administration. Source: JAMA.

Score

Score = Clinical Trials $ − Military $

Positive = net investment in medicine. Negative = net investment in military. Everyone is negative.

Ratio

Ratio = Military $ ÷ Clinical Trials $

Higher means more military spending per dollar of clinical-trial funding. ∞ means the politician voted for military spending but for no bill with clinical-trial funding.

The Maths

Ansari, Yassamin voted for none of the tracked military spending or clinical-trial funding.

Does This Match Your Priorities?

Express your budget preferences and see how your priorities compare to Ansari, Yassamin's actual votes.

Express Preferences All Politicians

Booting Earth Optimization System

Thank you for your patience. Your civilization is very important to us.

Vote Record

How We Calculate

Military $

Military $ = Σ (bill amount for each YEA vote on NDAA, supplementals, or omnibus military portion)

NDAA and supplementals count at face value. Omnibus bills count only the military appropriation (~$858–886B/yr).

Clinical Trials $

Trials $ = NIH budget × 0.033

Only 3.3% of the NIH budget funds clinical trials ($1.56B of $47.3B). The other 96.7% is basic research, overhead, and administration. Source: JAMA.

Score

Score = Clinical Trials $ − Military $

Positive = net investment in medicine. Negative = net investment in military. Everyone is negative.

Ratio

Ratio = Military $ ÷ Clinical Trials $

Higher means more military spending per dollar of clinical-trial funding. ∞ means the politician voted for military spending but for no bill with clinical-trial funding.